Jun 11, 2014; New York, NY, USA; New York Rangers center Derek Stepan (21) swats the puck from off the goal line behind goalie Henrik Lundqvist (30) during the third period in game four of the 2014 Stanley Cup Final against the Los Angeles Kings at Madison Square Garden. Mandatory Credit: Bruce Bennett/Pool Photo via USA TODAY Sports

Stanley Cup Final Game 4: What We Learned


The Los Angeles Kings supposedly learned back in 2012 that if you do not eliminate a team when you have the chance, they can quickly get back into the series, as the Devils did when they won two in a row before the Kings finally finished them off in Game 6. In case the Kings forgot, rallying from a 3-0 deficit against the San Jose Sharks in round one of this year’s playoffs, as well as their difficulty in eliminating the Chicago Blackhawks should have served as a reminder. While last night’s loss to the New York Rangers should not have the Kings in panic mode just yet, the Rangers are one victory away from making last night’s win into the start of a legitimate come back.

  •  Henrik Is Still King No Rangers player has taken more flak through the first three games of this Stanley Cup Final than Henrik Lundqvist. In those games, Lundqvist had a .892 SV% and a 3.13 GAA, uncharacteristically mediocre stats for the star goaltender. Facing elimination, the Henrik Lundqvist that has backstopped the New York Rangers to the cup final, finally made an appearance. Lundqvist made 40 saves and once against proved he is the Rangers most valuable asset when facing elimination.
  • Puck Luck There was a lot of discussion about the Rangers lack of “puck luck” after Game 3. Maybe the hockey gods finally answered Lundqvist’s prayers, as the Kings came within inches of scoring twice, only to have the puck stop perfectly on the goal line. Anton Stralman was able to clear the puck off the line in the first period and Derek Stepan used his hand late in the third. Stepan had to avoid placing his hand over the puck, otherwise the Kings would get a penalty shot.
  • Not Time For Panic Mode We have not seen a team sweep a Stanley Cup Final since the 1998 Detroit Red Wings. For the Kings to complete their sweep of the New York Rangers would be an enormous accomplishment in today’s NHL. This year’s playoffs have shown that no team is truly out of it, even when facing the seemingly insurmountable odds of a 3-0 deficit. At the same time, the Rangers slipped by the Kings in Game 4. New York managed one shot on goal in a third period that was dominated by the Los Angeles Kings. If Los Angeles had played the first two periods like they did in the third, it is likely we would have seen the Stanley Cup last night.

Tags: Featured Los Angeles Kings New York Rangers Popular Stanley Cup Final

  • BT Farley

    That’s not true at all. The Kings played well in the 3rd period but the reason they had as many chances and zone time as they did. Is because the NYR decide to stop playing. They sit back and instead of forechecking, they use their 1-2-2 as a moderate neutral zone trap. I watched the Bruins run in 2011 when they beat AV’s Canucks to win the Cup. AV plays not to lose rather than to win in the 3rd. He should be more aggressive like in periods 1 & 2. It’s the only flaw I can find in his strategy from an anylitical standpoint.
    The 1-2-2 is more of a moderate Forecheck to begin with. Only sending 1 forechecker in deep after the puck. Unless a turnover is happening or possible. That is up to the next closest player to the puck known as F2. Whereas the 2-1-2 the Kings use is more aggressive. AV has been aggressive on the Forecheck sending that 2nd man more often. He stops in the 3rd and hardly sends the one forechecker. This is important because the Kings aren’t allowing the NYR to play like they want to. The NYR want to carry the puck in the zone. LA is trapping at middle ice making AV use a dump n chase. This makes the Forecheck imperitive. Also read my post on Bluelinestation and look at the chart. It’s a puck luck or PDO chart. See how lucky the NYR were against Pitt at the end and MTL vs this series.